01
Your tax base
Voted yes
Tax exemptions for data centers through 2050 — 2065 for some sites
On December 12, 2024, Camilleri voted yes on two bills that extend tax breaks for data-center equipment and create new sales-and-use tax exemptions for large “enterprise” data centers. Qualifying facilities get the break through 2050. Some brownfield or former power-plant sites get it through 2065.
To qualify, a project needs at least $250 million in capital investment and only 30 qualifying new jobs, plus wage and maintenance rules. That is a lot of tax preference for a small permanent-job floor.
- The votes
- Senate RC 572 and 576 · Dec. 12, 2024
- The bills
- SB 237 and HB 4906
- The fiscal note
- Likely $52.5 million or more through 2065 — possibly over $90 million
What it means for you. This is not a $90 million check that families “pay off” like a loan. It is decades of industry-specific tax exemptions. Money the state will not collect from companies that can afford to pay — while Downriver households keep paying theirs.
Sources:
Senate journal, roll calls 572 & 576 ·
Enrolled HB 4906 ·
Senate Fiscal Agency analysis ·
Michigan data-center program
02
Your paycheck
Voted no
He voted against cutting the income tax for every Michigan taxpayer
On February 23, 2017, House Bill 4001 would have lowered Michigan’s 4.25% income-tax rate to 4.15% in 2018 and 4.05% in 2019, with further cuts toward 3.9% if the rainy-day fund stayed healthy. The bill failed 52–55. Camilleri voted no.
In his written explanation he said the cut would endanger services and help higher earners, and that he preferred other tax relief. That is his argument. The recorded fact is that when the vote was a broad rate cut for everyone, he was a no.
- The vote
- House RC 5 · Feb. 23, 2017
- The bill
- HB 4001 (2017)
- The rate
- Would have started down from 4.25%
What it means for you. A no vote on a tax cut is not the same as passing a new tax. It is a choice. He chose not to lower the rate that comes out of a Downriver paycheck.
Sources:
House journal, including his explanation ·
House Fiscal Agency analysis
03
A new tax
Voted yes
A new 24% wholesale tax on legal marijuana
On October 3, 2025, Camilleri voted yes on House Bill 4951. Public Act 23 of 2025 puts a 24% excise tax on specified wholesale marijuana transactions starting January 1, 2026. After administration costs, the money is sent to the Neighborhood Road Fund.
The Senate Fiscal Agency’s 2026 enacted-law analysis estimated about $420.7 million a year. A 24% wholesale tax is not a 24-point jump at every register. It is still a new tax on the legal market, and those costs get passed along.
- The vote
- Senate RC 264 · Oct. 3, 2025 · 19–17
- The bill
- HB 4951 · Public Act 23 of 2025
- The estimate
- About $420.7 million a year
What it means for you. He voted no on cutting the income tax. He voted yes on a new tax. Roads need money. So do households. This is which side of that trade he took.
Sources:
Senate journal, roll call 264 ·
Senate Fiscal Agency summary as enacted
04
Your power bill
Voted yes
Binding clean-energy deadlines — 80% by 2035, 100% by 2040
On November 8, 2023, Camilleri voted yes to concur in Senate Bill 271. Public Act 235 requires 80% clean energy by 2035 and 100% by 2040, plus renewable targets of 50% by 2030 and 60% by 2035.
The law allows nuclear generation and some natural gas with carbon capture, and it has extension valves. It does not, by itself, prove any one household’s bill will rise by a specific dollar amount. It does lock utilities into a fast build-out of generation and transmission. Those costs show up in rates.
- The vote
- Senate RC 674 · Nov. 8, 2023 · 20–17
- The bill
- SB 271 · Public Act 235 of 2023
- The mandate
- 100% clean energy by 2040
What it means for you. Your utility’s long-term plan is now a statute. DTE uses grid-upgrade and clean-energy buildout to justify rate cases — including the $474 million request now in front of the MPSC. He took the utility money. He voted for the mandate. You get the bill, and the outage.
Sources:
Senate journal, roll call 674 ·
Enrolled SB 271 ·
MPSC clean-energy standard
05
Your hometown
Voted yes
Lansing can override your town on large wind, solar, and battery projects
The same day, Camilleri voted yes on House Bill 5120. Public Act 233 creates a state siting path for large solar (50 MW), wind (100 MW), and energy-storage projects. If a local government denies a project that meets state standards, the developer can take it to the Michigan Public Service Commission. State rules can beat a more restrictive local ordinance.
Towns still get a seat at the table through compatible ordinances. They no longer always get the last word.
- The vote
- Senate RC 669 · Nov. 8, 2023 · 20–18
- The bill
- HB 5120 · Public Act 233 of 2023
- The trigger
- Solar 50 MW · Wind 100 MW · Storage 50 MW
What it means for you. If a large project is proposed in Brownstown, Huron, Sumpter, Van Buren, or anywhere else in the district, your township board may not be able to make a denial stick.
Sources:
Senate journal, roll call 669 ·
MPSC siting FAQ
06
Your kids’ schools
Voted yes
A 92% cut to school safety and mental-health grants — then a partial restore
On June 27, 2024, Camilleri voted yes on the House Bill 5507 conference report, and he signed it as a Senate conferee. That first FY 2024–25 budget dropped Section 31aa per-pupil mental-health and school-safety grants from $328 million to $26.5 million — a $301.5 million, 91.9% cut. A separate school mental-health appropriation of about $107.8 million remained.
On September 25, 2024, he voted yes to restore $125 million. Final Section 31aa funding: $151.5 million. That is still $176.5 million, or about 54%, below the prior $328 million.
- The votes
- Senate RC 331 · June 27, 2024, then RC 354 · Sept. 25, 2024
- The first cut
- $328 million down to $26.5 million
- After the restore
- $151.5 million — still 54% below
What it means for you. This did not wipe out every dollar of school mental-health funding. It did yank a dedicated safety-and-support grant down to a fraction of what districts had, then put only part of it back. Schools had to plan in that uncertainty.
Sources:
June Senate journal, roll call 331 ·
Senate Fiscal Agency initial analysis ·
September restore, roll call 354 ·
MDE on the restoration
07
Corporate incentives
Voted yes
$846 million from the General Fund into a corporate attraction reserve
On September 28, 2022, while still in the House, Camilleri voted yes on the Senate Bill 844 conference report. Public Act 194 of 2022 included an $846.1 million General Fund deposit into the Strategic Outreach and Attraction Reserve — SOAR. The broader supplemental also funded other programs, including health and human services.
A fund deposit is not proof that the entire pile went to one company, or that it was stolen. It is a large amount of public money set aside for business-attraction deals instead of a broad tax cut or other household relief.
- The vote
- House RC 455 · Sept. 28, 2022 · 76–28
- The bill
- SB 844 · Public Act 194 of 2022
- The deposit
- $846.1 million into SOAR
What it means for you. Incentive funds are a bet that subsidized projects will pay off. Voters get to decide whether that bet was worth it while grocery, insurance, and energy bills were climbing.
Sources:
House journal, roll call 455 ·
Senate Fiscal Agency summary as enacted
08
Corporate incentives
Voted yes
$630 million for one development site in Marshall
On February 28, 2023, Camilleri voted yes on House Bill 4016. The enacted bill put $299.7 million toward land acquisition and site preparation involving the Marshall Area Economic Development Alliance, and $330 million toward related transportation and infrastructure — $629.7 million combined. It also deposited another $170.3 million into SOAR and funded unrelated programs.
That is not an unrestricted cash payment to one automaker. It is still hundreds of millions of public dollars committed to a particular development site.
- The vote
- Senate RC 28 · Feb. 28, 2023 · 22–16
- The bill
- HB 4016 of 2023
- The combined site cost
- $629.7 million
What it means for you. Opportunity cost is the whole argument. That money could have gone to roads in Wayne County, school support, or leaving more in taxpayers’ pockets. He voted to put it into one site.
Sources:
Senate journal, roll call 28 ·
Senate Fiscal Agency summary as enacted